Should bowlers be
allowed to experiment?
The
availability of less time has given birth to T20 cricket where batsmen go after
the bowlers in order to please their masters and spectators. We have seen in
lot of matches where a team requires six or seven of the last over and the
batsman on strike changes his stance (switch hit) and hits the bowler for a
six. The former cricketers have raised their concerns on such innovations.
According to many of them, if a batsman can change his natural batting stance
why can't bowlers? The bowlers are being scrutinized and controlled by a rule
book while batsmen are like free birds these days.
A batsman is allowed to
innovate and attack the bowlers while bowlers are made to follow strict
guidelines. Dilscoop by Tillakaratne Dilshan, the helicopter shot by MS Dhoni
and switch-hit by Kevin Pietersen and David Warner are the new modes of scoring
runs in international cricket. If batsmen are changing because of the new
format then why should bowlers be made to sit behind and go for runs? They
shouldn't be bound to bowl in a particular action and within a limit of 15
degrees. Let's take a look at few ways which could put bowlers in good position
against the batsmen.
Innovative shots vs.
Bowling Arm
The
bowlers of this generation have become too predictable. The batsman knows all
about their bowling arm, action and the delivery which they are going to
bowl.
But a bowler can only imagine about the kind of shot a batsman will play
on his delivery. The batsman can come down the track or hit in any odd fashion.
He can apply switch hit or reverse sweep to up the tempo but there is no room
for experiment as far as bowlers are concerned. If the batsman can change his
stance, a bowler should be allowed to change his bowling arm. Let a batsman be
in some sort of confusion while facing any bowler and apply his brain
power to score runs. If ICC allow bowlers to change their bowling hands, the
game will certainly become more exciting.
The challenge of
bowling angles
A
ball has to travel 22 yards after being released from the bowlers hand only to behit in any fashion from a batsman. A bowler should be allowed to bend his arm
in any fashion before his delivery stride. The shortest format of the game has
taken the cruelty level on the bowlers to new heights and they have no choice
apart from bowling their regular stuff over after over. If the game is changing
keeping in mind the demands of the consumers, why can't this apply for bowlers?
The old rules are brought into notice whenever a bowler tries to do something
different while there is nothing of this sort in case of batters.
Quota of bowlers
A
batsman comes to bat at the start of an inning and has the option of staying
till the end but the bowlers are bound to bowl only limited amount of bowlers
in the shorter formats of the game. They can't exceed more than four in T20s
while the number goes up to ten in the limited over internationals. When a
batsman can take high percentage of overs to score runs why can't a bowler bowl
more overs to take wickets and restrict teams from scoring? The top bowlers of
any team is often hampered by limited opportunity of overs but if this is
removed, we would see more fierce bowling from them.
For More Kindly Visit to Our Official Website: http://crictoday.com
No comments:
Post a Comment